Home Artists Posts Import Register

Downloads

Content

The writer and podcaster David Moscrop, a contributing columnist for the Washington Post, returns to the pod from Ottawa to discuss a Spooky Season classic, Francis Ford Coppola’s lavish adaptation of Bram Stoker’s Dracula, a film that turned 30 years old this year but like a vampire has barely aged a day.

Coppola followed up The Godfather Part III with an ambitious gothic horror with an all-star cast, filmed entirely indoors on sets and soundstages. His visual effects supervisor was his son Roman Coppola, and they decided use techniques from the early days of cinema to adapt a novel from the same period.

We discuss the film’s “naive visual effects”, the over-the-top aesthetic from sets to costumes to performances, the film’s horniness which greatly influenced future vampire stories, and we try to mount a defense for the enduring knock against this film, the mannered turn by Keanu Reeves as Jonathan Harker.

Plus: we discuss Ontario Premier Doug Ford trying to weasel out of having to testify at the Emergencies Act inquiry in Ottawa.

Follow David Moscrop on Twitter, listen to his podcast Open To Debate, and subscribe to his new Substack!

From Den of Geek, “Bram Stoker’s Dracula and the Seduction of Old School Movie Magic”, an in-depth discussion with Roman Coppola of the film’s visual effects, by David Crow, October 16, 2020

Trailer for Bram Stoker’s Dracula (Francis Ford Coppola, 1992)

Files

Comments

Shane

I'm one of 93,000 competitive pinball players registered worldwide with the International Flipper Pinball Association. https://www.ifpapinball.com/player.php?p=15840. Canada has some great players, btw. I say this because BSD (Bram Stoker’s Dracula) is a very popular pinball machine, and can be found at many competitive locations. https://www.ifpapinball.com/calendar/ Use the calendar to find tournaments in your local area! Blood is a precious thing in these times!

Jesper Ohlsson

..I think my only note is that you guys didn't really delve into the fashion of this movie. It's one of those movies I watched as a kid/teen, where the visuals were experienced as "wow, that was interesting; I bet the next movie will be equally interesting", and not really having the proper context for understanding how rare it was/would be for a movie to have this unique mix of dawn-of-cinema trickery, european folklore, and pushed through very carefully considered lens of asian influences to highlight a sense of otherworldniness. ...If you see this movie at a young age, you just think that this is how movies normally operate and are constructed, and only later in life you realize that "no, this was actually a really special mix of ingredients working really well, and it's quite rare that you can get anything workable from that ambition, and let alone an interesting film (even if "only" on a purely visual/costuming level).